Directed by: Aaron Sorkin
Starring: Mikey Madison, Jeremy Allen White, Jeremy Strong, Bill Burr, Betty Gilpin, Wunmi Mosaku
The Social Reckoning kept my interest while failing to emotionally engage me. Writer-director Aaron Sorkin (who wrote the Oscar-winning screenplay for 2010's The Social Network) continues his mastery of verbal volleyball between characters while making the argument that Facebook's willful use of algorithms radicalized people with constant exposure to hate groups and hate speech that led directly (or indirectly) to the riots on January 6, 2021. Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg made it clear that Facebook policing its content is not its job, and I can't say I disagree with the position. More on that later.
The Social Reckoning stars Oscar-winner Mikey Madison as Frances Haugen, a dedicated Facebook employee who finds herself willing to turn over evidence of Facebook wrongdoing once a friend of hers posts anti-DEI rhetoric in a confrontation with police, which is shown in an effective prologue. Frances wants to know how her friend, who was mostly apolitical and happy, suddenly transformed into an angry, drunken, and argumentative influencer. Frances works with Wall Street Journal reporter Jeff Horwitz (White), who finds Frances is the only Facebook employee willing to talk to him and break her non-disclosure agreement.
As played by Madison, Frances is intelligent and socially awkward, which are two reasons she is reluctant to trust Jeff. However, she is blown away in both of those departments by Jeremy Strong's Zuckerberg, who raises Jesse Eisenberg's cold and socially awkward Zuckerberg to the tenth power here. Strong doesn't play Zuckerberg to be even remotely likable and Sorkin is content to make him the arrogant villain who asks for advice and ignores it anyway. The man advising him not to be such a prick is Charlie, played by Bill Burr in an engaging performance as someone trying to stop Zuckerberg from driving the company straight off a cliff in the court of public opinion. Zuckerberg abandons the company's initial mission statement to be one where people connect and instead opts for a version which tears people apart and ends friendships and familial relationships. Why? Mostly because leaning towards Republicans, who favor deregulation in business, would be a financial win for the company. It's a practical decision and one can argue it was best for shareholders who want to see a monster return on their investments.
I admired the performances in the movie while understanding The Social Reckoning is an invitation to thought. I'm of the belief that it isn't a platform's job to fact check anything, of which Facebook agrees. I'm reminded of Bill Maher's editorial from a few years back stating that protecting someone from the world is a mother's job, not a social media platform's. With the advent of AI, some posts all over Facebook and other sites are clearly lies, but it's up to the user to determine what's true. It's ironic that in a world with so much information at its fingertips, some people are more misinformed than ever.


