Michael (2026) * *

 

Directed by:  Antoine Fuqua

Starring:  Jafaar Jackson, Colman Domingo, Miles Teller, Nia Long, Juliano Krue Valdi, Larenz Tate

We are more than aware of Michael Jackson's controversial history which came to light in the 1990's and dogged him until his death in 2009.  He was only fifty when he died and left enough for ten legacies.  Michael only brings his story up to 1988 with a promise of his story continuing.  Will the next installment cover the allegations of sexual molestation and his later trial?  If it doesn't, then the entire story is dishonest and guilty of the sin of omission.  It would be like a film encompassing World War II which doesn't mention the Nazis.  

I'm reviewing what's in Michael, not what isn't in it.  The movie does not need to foreshadow his later sins with every scene.  Michael seems to exist in the moment, and at the peak of his fame, he is depicted as a near-saint who yearns for a lost childhood and a father figure that is anyone other than his real father Joseph (Domingo).  There is naturally plenty of music and dancing, and Michael Jackson was indeed a superstar and a trail blazer as far as music is concerned.  Admitting that in no way means that his later actions are condoned or acceptable.  

Jafaar Jackson (Michael's real-life nephew) captures the spirit of Michael Jackson and has the moves.  He does what he can, but the movie itself only goes skin deep in its depiction of him.  There isn't a lot of depth here and it feels like a standard musical biopic.  It is meh extended out to a little over two hours of running time, even with Domingo relishing his role as the antagonistic Joseph.  The other Jackson brothers exist only to support Michael and don't have any personalities or traits of their own.  This movie is all about Michael Jackson and everyone else is relegated to the background.  Janet Jackson, who of course created her own path on the way to the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, doesn't even exist in Michael.  Were there legal wranglings or did she just not want to be associated with the film?  I'm reminded of 2023's The Iron Claw about the Von Erich wrestling family which left out an entire child who himself committed suicide under the spotlight of being a member of the famous clan.  

Michael's reviews have been ugly, but the movie isn't as bad as those notices.  It only tells part of the story and not very insightfully.   It sees much but doesn't see through.  Will the next chapter treat its subject the same way?  Only time will tell.